The Arbitrator (Mr Hall) concluded that Mr Williams did yell at Mr Rossi, that the comment was upsetting to Mr Rossi,and that the comment was heard by others in the workplace. Mr Hall accepted that Mr Williams’s apology at the meeting was a sincere apology and that his offer of a written apology was also sincere. [Click on Logo to learn more]
The Burden Of Proof Exists For the Complainant. An excerpt: Ms Mora’s first example constituted a comment made by Mr Karan soon after he came to be employed at the same location. Mr Karan said that he liked his new job and that he intended on staying at the pharmacy. She did not provide any detail as to how this comment harassed her on the basis of age or sex. [Click on Pic to learn more]
“Mr Hornsby was employed as an Operator at a City yard. He was discharged from the City by way of letter dated December 24th which referred to ‘inappropriate behavior in the workplace’. The ‘inappropriate behavior’ related primarily to a number of statements made by Mr Hornsby to visible minority employees. The Union submitted a grievance which alleged that Mr Hornsby had been unjustly discharged.” [Click on Pic to lean more]
“Mr Rogers was a lawyer by trade and the Director of Labour Relations for a city. Ms. Ray was the Chief of Staff. They had a relationship that lasted two years. Mr. Rogers inability to accept the end of the relationship began his downward spiral.” [Click on Pic to learn more]
